Skip to content
Vote BlueEspañol
Editorial illustration of an Alaska ballot in an Arctic coastal landscape with salmon, a fishing boat, mountains, and power lines under an aurora.

Alaska Senate · 2026 · Candidate comparison

Mary Peltola vs. Dan Sullivan

One Senate seat. Two sharply different records on affordability, fisheries, energy, and accountability in Washington.

At a glance

The candidates in this race.

Candidate

Democrat

Mary Peltola

Former U.S. Representative · Alaska at-large

A former House member and fisheries leader running to lower family costs, protect Alaska salmon and stop congressional self-dealing.

VS

Candidate

Republican
DS

Dan Sullivan

U.S. Senator · Alaska · since 2015

A former Alaska attorney general and natural-resources commissioner, and a retired Marine Corps officer.

Where they stand

Where they differ.

Policy priorities.

Mary Peltola

Democrat

Dan Sullivan

Republican

The backgrounds

Public careers.

Mary Peltola

  1. 2024

    Helped protect nearly 80 Guard positions

    Working with Alaska's two senators, she pressed for an exemption from planned Air National Guard staffing cuts. The Guard granted Alaska an indefinite exemption.

  2. 2022

    Won Alaska's at-large House seat

    She won the special election to fill Don Young's seat and the subsequent general election, serving in the U.S. House until January 2025.

  3. 1999–2009

    Alaska state representative

    Served in Alaska's House of Representatives.

  4. 2017–2022

    Fisheries commission director

    Led the Kuskokwim River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission.

Dan Sullivan

  1. 2015

    U.S. Senate

    Began representing Alaska in the U.S. Senate in 2015.

The record.

Mary Peltola

Democrat

Policy choice

An all-of-the-above energy pitch

Peltola's campaign backs both the Willow oil project and expanded renewable-energy incentives. That puts her closer to an energy-development coalition than a no-drilling position.

Why it matters: A stated policy tradeoff, not an allegation of wrongdoing.

Dan Sullivan

Republican

Policy choice

Backing Trump's tax-and-spending law

Sullivan has highlighted his vote for President Trump's major tax-and-spending package. Peltola has made opposition to that law part of her case against him.

Why it matters: A clear voting contrast, not an allegation of wrongdoing.

Documented outcome

Pebble Mine tapes prompted scrutiny

Secretly recorded 2020 conversations captured Pebble Mine executives saying they expected Alaska's senators, including Sullivan, would not ultimately block the project. After the recordings became public, Sullivan said he opposed the mine and supported denial of its permit.

Why it matters: The executives' statements were their own assertions, not evidence that Sullivan had an agreement with the company. They nevertheless intensified scrutiny of the project and his earlier position.

Policy choice

Voted to acquit Trump in 2021 impeachment trial

The official Senate roll call records Sullivan as voting "not guilty" on the 2021 impeachment charge against former President Donald Trump.

Why it matters: A public vote on a nationally divisive proceeding—not a misconduct finding about Sullivan.

Sources.

  1. 01Mary Peltola campaign
  2. 02Mary Peltola campaign - affordability
  3. 03Mary Peltola campaign - energy
  4. 04Mary Peltola campaign - fish
  5. 05Mary Peltola campaign - fixing the system
  6. 06Alaska delegation - Air National Guard positions protected
  7. 07U.S. House History - Mary Peltola biography
  8. 08Senator Dan Sullivan - biography
  9. 09Senator Dan Sullivan - 2026 annual address
  10. 10Associated Press - 2026 Alaska Senate race overview
  11. 11Alaska Public Media - Pebble Mine recordings and Sullivan's response
  12. 12U.S. Senate - 2021 impeachment-trial roll call

Want the complete ballot for your address? The guide is context; the certified ballot is what you vote.

Find your ballot